Null hypothesis

Null hypothesis - Jan Cieślikiewicz - Phases Magazine
Null hypothesis - Jan Cieślikiewicz - Phases Magazine
Null hypothesis - Jan Cieślikiewicz - Phases Magazine
Null hypothesis - Jan Cieślikiewicz - Phases Magazine
Null hypothesis - Jan Cieślikiewicz - Phases Magazine
Null hypothesis - Jan Cieślikiewicz - Phases Magazine
Null hypothesis - Jan Cieślikiewicz - Phases Magazine
Null hypothesis - Jan Cieślikiewicz - Phases Magazine

The modern world rejects randomness and shuns ambiguity. It strives for understanding, predictability; it gives an illusion of control. The media is full of experts confidently foretelling the future. The past is explained away with little room for doubt. Not having a stance is considered a sign of weakness. Yet the natural state of human psyche, and our whole existence, our “null hypothesis,” is a state of confusion and uncertainty.

“Null hypothesis” refers to one of the most important analytical research methods used across a variety of fields, from psychology to physics. In null hypothesis testing it is usually presumed that given observations result purely from chance, whereas the alternative implies influence by a non-random cause. The aim of this method is to reject the null hypothesis, and thus prove—with certainty beyond reasonable doubt—that the random explanation is false, and the hypothesized non-random one is true.

From every day events to the most fundamental questions, both on a personal and cosmic scale, we are surrounded by contradictions, unknowns, and change. Everything that seems to us as absolute will come to pass. History is full of dead truths, and people that fought for them. Religions, as timeless as they seem, have their beginning and will one day see an end. In science, basic concepts like time and space take on new meanings with each generation. Some things are just not to be resolved.